![]() As soon as they could, they dropped the story, despite the dramatic claims in the memo. When the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence’s majority memo was made public last week, many journalists highlighted Democratic talking points against it or otherwise rushed to defend the agencies credibly accused of abuse of power. So how have the media responded to these official statements regarding wrongdoing? Mostly by downplaying, mocking, and ignoring them. government on the record, not selective and political leaks from anonymous sources. These are statements made by elected members of the U.S. In recent weeks, however, some official documents have come to light. And all of those personnel changes were made before even the first official reports and memoranda from these investigations were made public. ![]() These investigations have resulted in the firing, demotion, and reassignment of at least six top officials at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Department of Justice. Investigations by multiple congressional committees as well as an investigation by the inspector general of the Department of Justice have shown irregularities in the handling of the most politically sensitive probes in recent memory: the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information while secretary of State and the investigation into the Trump campaign’s alleged nefarious ties with Russia to meddle in a U.S. No story update has been too small, no encounter with a Russian too inconsequential, and no anonymous source too sketchy to generate outsize coverage and histrionic claims from major media.īut as the Russian collusion story disintegrates, another interesting story ascends. For more than a year and a half, the media have gone all-in on reporting every possible angle of President Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |